Spiderman 3 sucks slightly less than most people think it does, but it’s still pretty awful nonetheless. The biggest crime of this film was that it somehow took Best Visual Effects from Transformers at the Oscars with its CGI polar bears.
The atheist’s Chronicles of Narnia just wasn’t as good as Chronicles of Narnia, which really wasn’t that good to begin with. How much can it cost to make someone fly these days? We really did want a triumphant return for Superman, but when he finally did return to earth, we find out that he’s just kind of awkward and outdated. I’m really not quite sure why exactly this movie cost so much money. Unfortunately, when the humans start talking is where things start to go to hell. Most of the money here was spent on Kong himself, and all the scenes with him in them are excellent. Not only were most of the sets CGI, but the half the cast was too, and without a solid direction, the two sequels to the original Pirates seemed unnecessary and tacked on. Yeah we’re doing a double feature here as the two are essentially the same movie. You’ll be surprised to see that even though most of these movies are pretty awful, nearly all of them made their massive budgets back, mostly thanks to distribution overseas, which is included in the “Made” stat.ġ5 &14) Pirates of the Caribbean Dead Man’s Chest and At World’s End Yes, sucking is subjective and I’m sure you’ll disagree with me, but such is our way here at Unreality. I picked out what I thought were the 15 worst most expensive movies ever made and lined them up in order of how much they suck. I guess it’s proof that money doesn’t buy quality, but really, shouldn’t it buy at least a little bit? When you take a look at the most expensive movies ever made, it’s quite surprisingly to see how many of them are mediocre or actually pretty terrible.
0 kommentar(er)
